Legacy system: Difference between revisions

From Computer Science Wiki
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Legacy systems are usually '''still in use''' as opposed to retired (or archived) systems, which are no longer in use. Please remember this distinction.  
Legacy systems are usually '''still in use''' as opposed to retired (or archived) systems, which are no longer in use. Please remember this distinction.  


=== All about legacy systems ===
Compatibility issues can arise in situations where a new system or technology must be integrated with an existing system or technology. These issues can be particularly pronounced in situations where the existing system is a legacy system, or in situations where two businesses are merging and their systems must be integrated.


Systems must be compatible with other systems if they are going to be useful. Legacy systems are not always compatible with newer systems. Compatibility is a state in which two things are able to exist or occur together without problems or conflict. When you are planning a new system, you should be aware of compatibility issues with older systems. Frequently, the way a legacy system stores data is the most frequent source of compatibility issues.
Some common compatibility issues that can arise in these situations include:


A few hypothetical examples may help you understand this:  
# Incompatibility of hardware or software: If the new system uses hardware or software that is not compatible with the existing system, it may be necessary to make changes to the existing system in order to enable the two systems to work together.
 
# Incompatibility of data formats: If the new system uses data formats that are not compatible with the existing system, it may be necessary to convert the data between the two systems in order to enable them to work together.
# A new system accepts input for a date as 11 November 2017, but the legacy system only accept input as 11 November 17
# Incompatibility of protocols: If the new system uses protocols (e.g. communication standards) that are not compatible with the existing system, it may be necessary to implement protocol conversion in order to enable the two systems to work together.
# A new system is web-based, but an older system is not web-based
# Incompatibility of processes: If the new system uses processes (e.g. workflows) that are not compatible with the existing system, it may be necessary to modify the processes in order to enable the two systems to work together.
# A new system allows [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8 UTF-8] (Unicode Transformation Format-8) characters but the legacy system does not.
# Incompatibility of user interfaces: If the new system has a user interface that is significantly different from the existing system, it may be difficult for users to adapt to the new system and may require training or other support to enable them to use the new system effectively.
# A new system assumes all currencies are in US dollars, while the legacy system does not.
# A new system stores time as HH:MM:SS:MS (HH: hour, MM: minute, SS: second, MS: millisecond) but the legacy system stores time as HH:MM:SS.
# A new system assumes all numbers can have 4 decimal places, while a legacy system assumes all numbers only have 2 decimal places.
# A new system stores data in XML while a legacy system stores data in plain text.


== Real-world practical advice ==
== Real-world practical advice ==
Line 24: Line 20:


There is a lot more to say about this, but my advice is to assume any system you are involved with needs to be compatible with other systems and legacy systems.
There is a lot more to say about this, but my advice is to assume any system you are involved with needs to be compatible with other systems and legacy systems.
== Do you understand this material? ==
This is a simple example:
Jana has a small business that buys and sells flowers. Her business is successful. She uses different systems to manage her inventory, point-of-sale, employees, and of course her business finances. Jana also has a website for her flower store where customers can learn about her business.
Jana is '''so''' successful she decides to expand her business, and buys an older company that buys and sells [https://www.google.com/search?q=cute+stuffed+animals&safe=strict&espv=2&biw=1380&bih=667&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwimhYC1ouHNAhWJez4KHVzPBvQQsAQIGg cute little stuffed animals].
Jana wants to merge the two companies together, expecting to benefit with increased sales.
Question 1: Outline possible compatibility issues resulting from our example above.
Question 2: List at least 5 questions would you ask to understand compatibility issues between the two businesses.


== Standards ==
== Standards ==

Latest revision as of 08:42, 8 January 2023

System Fundamentals[1]

In computing, a legacy system is an old method, technology, computer system, or application program, "of, relating to, or being a previous or outdated computer system."Often a pejorative term, referencing a system as "legacy" often implies that the system is out of date or in need of replacement.[2]

Legacy systems are usually still in use as opposed to retired (or archived) systems, which are no longer in use. Please remember this distinction.

Compatibility issues can arise in situations where a new system or technology must be integrated with an existing system or technology. These issues can be particularly pronounced in situations where the existing system is a legacy system, or in situations where two businesses are merging and their systems must be integrated.

Some common compatibility issues that can arise in these situations include:

  1. Incompatibility of hardware or software: If the new system uses hardware or software that is not compatible with the existing system, it may be necessary to make changes to the existing system in order to enable the two systems to work together.
  2. Incompatibility of data formats: If the new system uses data formats that are not compatible with the existing system, it may be necessary to convert the data between the two systems in order to enable them to work together.
  3. Incompatibility of protocols: If the new system uses protocols (e.g. communication standards) that are not compatible with the existing system, it may be necessary to implement protocol conversion in order to enable the two systems to work together.
  4. Incompatibility of processes: If the new system uses processes (e.g. workflows) that are not compatible with the existing system, it may be necessary to modify the processes in order to enable the two systems to work together.
  5. Incompatibility of user interfaces: If the new system has a user interface that is significantly different from the existing system, it may be difficult for users to adapt to the new system and may require training or other support to enable them to use the new system effectively.

Real-world practical advice[edit]

When you are planning a new system you should include compatibility planning as part of your new system. If you are a system administrator, programmer, network administrator, much of your work will involve getting different systems to be compatible. It's always nice when you have a new system, new company, and a new process, but this isn't the norm.

There is a lot more to say about this, but my advice is to assume any system you are involved with needs to be compatible with other systems and legacy systems.

Standards[edit]

  • Outline compatibility issues resulting from situations including legacy systems or business mergers.

References[edit]