2020 case study: Difference between revisions
Mr. MacKenty (talk | contribs) (Created page with "right|frame|Case study<ref>http://www.flaticon.com/</ref> == Introduction == This page will help you organize and understand the 2020 case study....") |
Mr. MacKenty (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
== Previous years case study == | == Previous years case study == | ||
* [[2019 case study|Click here for 2019 case study wiki-notes]] | |||
* [[2018 case study|Click here for 2018 case study wiki-notes]] | * [[2018 case study|Click here for 2018 case study wiki-notes]] | ||
* [[2017 case study|Click here for 2017 case study wiki-notes]] | * [[2017 case study|Click here for 2017 case study wiki-notes]] | ||
Revision as of 06:41, 30 May 2019
Case study[1]
Introduction[edit]
This page will help you organize and understand the 2020 case study.
The case study[edit]
Click here for the full pdf case study
Terms worth deeply understanding[edit]
These articles have been written by students. Any article with a green checkmark 
has been approved by a teacher and can be used reliably to study.
- Template for student-defined terms
- 51% attack
- Block
- Blockchain
- Block header
- Candidate block
- Collision resistance
- Cryptocurrency
- Cryptographic hash
- Determinism
- Digital signature
- Distributed consensus
- Double-spend problem
- Entropy
- Genesis block
- Immutable transactions
- Key pair generation
- Ledger
- Merkle proof
- Merkle tree
- Miner
- Mining
- Nonce
- Non-invertibility
- Non-repudiation
- One-way function
- Proof of work
- PuTTYgen
- Self-referential data structure
- SHA256
- Takeover attack
- Transaction pool
Previous years case study[edit]
- Click here for 2019 case study wiki-notes
- Click here for 2018 case study wiki-notes
- Click here for 2017 case study wiki-notes
- Click here for the 2018 case study
- Click here for the 2017 case study
- Click here for the 2016 case study