Debugging: Difference between revisions

From Computer Science Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
(30 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:square.png|right|frame|This a problem set for you to work through <ref>http://www.flaticon.com/</ref>]]
== Terminology ==


This is a problem set. Some of these are easy, others are far more difficult. The purpose of these problems sets are to HELP YOU THINK THROUGH problems. The solution is at the bottom of this page, but please don't look at it until you have tried (and failed) at least three or four times.  
In computers, debugging is the process of locating and fixing or bypassing bugs (errors) in computer program code or the engineering of a hardware device. To debug a program or hardware device is to start with a problem, isolate the source of the problem, and then fix it. A user of a program that does not know how to fix the problem may learn enough about the problem to be able to avoid it until it is permanently fixed. When someone says they've debugged a program or "worked the bugs out" of a program, they imply that they fixed it so that the bugs no longer exist.<ref>http://searchsoftwarequality.techtarget.com/definition/debugging</ref>


Debugging is the process of finding and resolving of defects that prevent correct operation of computer software or a system. Debugging tends to be harder when various subsystems are tightly coupled, as changes in one may cause bugs to emerge in another.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debugging#Typical_debugging_process</ref>


== What is this problem set trying to do ==
== A debugging process ==
[[File:Arrows.png|right|frame|This is an important process for you to understand <ref>http://www.flaticon.com/</ref>]]
6 Steps to fix an error


'''You are going to create errors when you code!''' There is a process to follow when you are debugging. I expect EVERY student to follow these steps when you are debugging. The purpose of this problem set is to encourage you to understand and apply your understanding of the debugging process to your code (and the code of a classmate).  
The correct approach to debug is to follow a very structured procedure based on repeating the same steps for every bug, the reason for this is that bugs usually are symptoms of a much bigger problem going on, so in order for us to uncover the real nature of the error we have to make sure we do an exhaustive and systematic revision of it.


== The Problem ==
The degree of formality when following the steps may vary depending on the bug, for critical errors it is better to document every single step in a document. For minor errors, or bugs found while coding it is just enough to follow them as a mental guideline.


You should write a program that asks a user to enter an email address. Your program should check if the email:
===Step 1. Identify the error.===


# has an @ sign
This is an obvious step but a tricky one, sometimes a bad identification of an error can cause lots of wasted developing time.
# has a period .
# has a common top level domain (org, com)


== Some Code to Get You Started ==
A few tips to make sure you identify the bug correctly:


<syntaxhighlight lang="python">
# See the error.
# Reproduce the error.
''You never should say that an error has been fixed if you were not able to reproduce it.''
# Understand what the expected behavior should be.
# Validate the identification.
''Ask yourself: is this expected behavior or an actual error?''


email = raw_input("Enter your email ")


=== Step 2. Find the error. ===


</syntaxhighlight>
Once we have an error correctly identified, it is time to go through the code to find the exact spot where the error is located, at this stage we are  not interested in understanding the big picture for the error, we are just focused on finding it. A few techniques that may help to find an error are:


== Take This Further ==
# Logging. It can be to the console, file… It should help you to trace the error in the code.
# Debugging. Debugging in the most technical sense of the word, meaning turning on whatever the debugger you are using and stepping through the code.
# Removing code. 
<blockquote style="padding: 5px; background-color: #FAAFBA; border: solid thin gray;">
  [[File:Exclamation.png]] This is one of the most important strategies you can use to find errors:


# you can test for a @ and a . Could you also test for common misspellings?
  ''Take out half of the code from the action causing the program to produce an error and keep splitting the code until you find the error.''
# if you can test for common misspellings, could you suggest the correct spelling?
</blockquote>
# we can check for common .com, .org, addresses but what about other top level domain names [http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db click here for a fairly scary list of them]


== How you will be assessed ==
=== Step 3. Analyze the error ===


Every problem set is a formative assignment.  [[Media:Problem-setrubric.pdf|Please click here to see how you will be graded]]
This is a critical step, use a bottom-up approach from the place the error was found and analyze the code so you can see the big picture of the error, analyzing a bug has two main goals: to check that around that error there aren’t any other errors to be found (the iceberg metaphor), and to make sure what are the risks of entering any collateral damage in the fix.


== References ==
=== Step 4. Document the error ===


<references />
At this stage you are almost ready to start coding the fix. If you are working on a complex application, please document your fix in an error reporting database.


== See also ==  
=== Step 5. Fix the error. ===


[http://www.openbookproject.net/thinkcs/python/english2e/app_a.html a short paper on the debugging process]
That’s it, finally you can fix the error!


== A possible solution ==
=== Step 6. Validate the solution.===


Run the program again and reproduce the same steps that you discovered in step 1.


<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">
<ref>http://www.makinggoodsoftware.com/2009/06/14/7-steps-to-fix-an-error/</ref>
Click the expand link to see one possible solution, but NOT before you have tried and failed at least three times
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">


<syntaxhighlight lang="python">
== References ==


top_level_domains = ['com', 'org', 'pl', 'kz', 'edu']
<references />
 
 
while True:
    email = raw_input("Enter you email ")
    if '@' not in email:
        print("Error: you need an @ sign in your email.")
        break
    elif '.' not in email:
        print("Error: you need a . sign in your email. Please try again")   
        break
    # I am grateful to my student Sneha for this line below. It is a succinct way of capturing the characters AFTER the period.
    elif email[email.index('.')+1:] not in top_level_domains:
        print("Error: you need a valid domain name at the end")   
    else:
        print("Success: the email address you entered has passed our basic validation tests.")
        break 
 
</syntaxhighlight>


</div>
[[Category:debugging]]
</div>
[[Category:problem set]]
[[Category:python]]
[[Category:strings]]

Revision as of 10:29, 7 January 2019

Terminology[edit]

In computers, debugging is the process of locating and fixing or bypassing bugs (errors) in computer program code or the engineering of a hardware device. To debug a program or hardware device is to start with a problem, isolate the source of the problem, and then fix it. A user of a program that does not know how to fix the problem may learn enough about the problem to be able to avoid it until it is permanently fixed. When someone says they've debugged a program or "worked the bugs out" of a program, they imply that they fixed it so that the bugs no longer exist.[1]

Debugging is the process of finding and resolving of defects that prevent correct operation of computer software or a system. Debugging tends to be harder when various subsystems are tightly coupled, as changes in one may cause bugs to emerge in another.[2]

A debugging process[edit]

This is an important process for you to understand [3]

6 Steps to fix an error

The correct approach to debug is to follow a very structured procedure based on repeating the same steps for every bug, the reason for this is that bugs usually are symptoms of a much bigger problem going on, so in order for us to uncover the real nature of the error we have to make sure we do an exhaustive and systematic revision of it.

The degree of formality when following the steps may vary depending on the bug, for critical errors it is better to document every single step in a document. For minor errors, or bugs found while coding it is just enough to follow them as a mental guideline.

Step 1. Identify the error.[edit]

This is an obvious step but a tricky one, sometimes a bad identification of an error can cause lots of wasted developing time.

A few tips to make sure you identify the bug correctly:

  1. See the error.
  2. Reproduce the error.

You never should say that an error has been fixed if you were not able to reproduce it.

  1. Understand what the expected behavior should be.
  2. Validate the identification.

Ask yourself: is this expected behavior or an actual error?


Step 2. Find the error.[edit]

Once we have an error correctly identified, it is time to go through the code to find the exact spot where the error is located, at this stage we are not interested in understanding the big picture for the error, we are just focused on finding it. A few techniques that may help to find an error are:

  1. Logging. It can be to the console, file… It should help you to trace the error in the code.
  2. Debugging. Debugging in the most technical sense of the word, meaning turning on whatever the debugger you are using and stepping through the code.
  3. Removing code.

Exclamation.png This is one of the most important strategies you can use to find errors:

Take out half of the code from the action causing the program to produce an error and keep splitting the code until you find the error.

Step 3. Analyze the error[edit]

This is a critical step, use a bottom-up approach from the place the error was found and analyze the code so you can see the big picture of the error, analyzing a bug has two main goals: to check that around that error there aren’t any other errors to be found (the iceberg metaphor), and to make sure what are the risks of entering any collateral damage in the fix.

Step 4. Document the error[edit]

At this stage you are almost ready to start coding the fix. If you are working on a complex application, please document your fix in an error reporting database.

Step 5. Fix the error.[edit]

That’s it, finally you can fix the error!

Step 6. Validate the solution.[edit]

Run the program again and reproduce the same steps that you discovered in step 1.

[4]

References[edit]